Wesley Verhoeve

Just another WordPress site

The Benefits Of Streaming (Or How I Learned To Stop Worrying And Love The Bomb)

I was a Spotify US beta tester about a year ago and have to admit that I didn’t really “get” it. The ugly design was (and still is) distracting, the search was (and is) broken, and I just fled back to my nice clean iTunes experience, comforted by a gigantic hard drive of music. A few months later I later tried Rdio and streaming finally clicked for me. My first thought as a consumer was: “Wow! This is awesome. I can have access to almost everything I have, plus everything else released, anytime? No more bulky hard drives and organizing my music!”. My first thought as an artist manager and label person was: “Oh crap, why would anyone ever want to buy a digital download again? We better think of something quick!”.

From a consumer’s point of view, having access to all this music for a cheap monthly fee is a winning value proposition. Beyond increasing your library to near infinity, it’s also much more convenient and easy to consume. No waiting, no cataloging, just search and click play. As high speed wi-fi access grows, and smart phones become the norm, it’s hard to deny that streaming will be the dominant way in which mainstream casual music fans will consume music. (Hardcore fans will follow an alternate consumption pattern, and more on this difference here: “The New Way Of Consuming Music”.)

From an artist and manager’s point of view, streaming represents a scary and radical shift in consumption. It includes a massive loss of income on a per customer basis. This shift changes all the financial aspects of releasing music. (For details on the difference in income between streaming vs downloads check out “Digital Retailers, Revenue Per Song”.) Rather than the typical music industry doom talk, I’d like to suggest that we look at how this shift could actually benefit artists. Once we get past our knee-jerk fear-based reaction, we see that streaming could actually be seen as a much needed breakthrough technology and shift to lead to industry growth after a decade of imploding. Benefits include the simplification of income tracking and accounting, lower overhead, the enormous amounts of new customer data and improved metrics, increased access for a larger audience, distribution efficiencies, and more.

The loss in income from digital downloads is very real of course, but we can look for ways to offset this loss, at least in part. This can happen through the benefits that come from improved metrics and properly measuring an artist’s influence and audience. This will be easier in the near future than it ever has been. It will be very similar to how a newspaper measures their circulation, and a TV show it’s ratings. With the right team and model, the modern artist becomes a multidisciplinary creator and curator, with an audience that rewards them by giving dedicated moments of attention, permission to market, and the purchase of tickets, merch and music. This attention is valuable to others who may want to partner with the artist on a project.

A second benefit is the artist’s ability to expand their audience faster and more easily through streaming services. The lower the effective monetary price to check out a new artist based on a friend’s recommendation, the more it will happen. In streaming this perceived cost is $0. We also see that streaming services have integrated all the easiest ways to stimulate people’s natural inclination to share what they love with friends. If an artist and her team capitalizes on this increased level of attention by providing more quality content and opportunities to see the artist perform live, the income will follow, often times faster than from the aged royalties on record sales model. Great examples of watching this in action at The Weeknd, Mac Miller and Drake during the lead up to his first album before he signed with Universal Motown.

Most established artists and companies would rather stop the audience’s move to streaming than adjust for it. Adjusting to this new consumption pattern takes a lot more grind and guts than the old way. Being an incumbent will be less and less beneficial as the gatekeeper roles change as well. Seeing that we can guarantee that consumer progress is impossible to stop, we shouldn’t waste any time complaining about it. Instead we should look to improve our business models to be more in line with our customer’s wishes and needs. Living through this evolution will certainly prove challenging for most of us, but much more so for those who insist on holding onto the old model. Those of us that embrace the challenge will also see better positioned to identify the opportunities it brings. That’s how we see it at Family Records at least.

Related Reading:

  • The New Way Of Consuming Music (Or A Dollar Less To Rihanna Means A Dollar More To Tegan And Sara) (read)
  • The Best Does Not Always Win (Or Why Spotify Will Beat Rdio) (read)
  • Music On The Move (Or How We Listen) (read)
  • The Importance Of Free Music (Or Give ‘Em A Taste First) (read)
  • Digital Retailers, Revenue Per Song (read)

15 Comments | Music Business | , , | 12.21.11.

  • Kevin King

    Absolutely love it. this is an awesome take on the space. I am the CEO of MusicHype, http://www.musichype.com where we are building the next iteration of the music business, music in the clouds and how to contextualize and rationalize it. Great stuff!

    Great 

    • http://wesleyverhoeve.com Wesley Verhoeve

      Thanks Kevin! Much appreciated. Will check out musichype too!

  • Anonymous

    Hi,

    Fascinating stuff to be sure.  I have to say that personally, I haven’t reached the ‘get it’ point with streaming yet.  I mean I’ve used Pandora for years, but I’ve not discovered the allure of spotify and the like.  But… I do get that a lot of other people do ‘get it’ and that there is potentially huge opportunity for independent artists – which is where my interest lies.

    My question is, do you see record labels becoming purveyors of merchandise and live/mixed media experiences, and the simple song or album unit becoming kind of the ‘loss leader’ to pull people into buying an experience?  

    Thanks for the great post!

    • Kevin King

      The huge difference with Pandora and the Spotify, Rdio, MOG, Deezer model, is the non-ability to on-demand tracks and skip over them. Pandora’s license does not allow for on demand streaming. 
      Outside of Pandora, how do you consumer music? Finally, yes I see the labels getting into merch and live music ticketing, ASAP!

      • Anonymous

        Right, I do grok the on-demand aspect.  I just haven’t made the jump from buying tracks for my on-demand listening to subscribing to a service.  Even though Pandora is getting pretty dated at this point, what I’ve enjoyed about it is the discovery.  Then I just go buy my tracks from itunes – or directly from the artist if possible.

        I actually really dig the idea of the music being basically free or near free, to drive people to performances and merch.  Live events are great products because you can’t take them home.  And merch, I mean the possibilities go so far beyond t-shirts and cozies.  What if you could buy a Black Keys mini-van that comes with tickets and VIP parking at every show in the country?

        • Kevin King

          well – if the Black keys were on Spotify, perhaps they could measure the viability of that and report it to Toyota – but alas – they are not!

          • Anonymous

            True, their new release isn’t on spotify yet, but the rest of their catalog is.  Which isn’t a bad strategy during this kind of transition period: get your CD and itunes sales bump from the initial release, release to streaming later.  

    • http://wesleyverhoeve.com Wesley Verhoeve

      ww

      • Anonymous

        It is an interesting proposition.  You take the product that is most difficult to create well and takes the most expertise to produce – the recorded music – and give it away (more or less) in favor of selling things that are comparatively easy to manufacture: merchandise and, to some extent, shows.  

        I understand why that makes people nervous.

        • http://wesleyverhoeve.com Wesley Verhoeve

          Well put Dan! But lets remember in the end it will be controlled by those who do make the music, even as a loss leader if that happens.

  • http://joeconyers.com Joe Conyers III

    I’m also incredibly excited about the future of streaming – mostly for the ecosystem it is about to create. This first wave of apps in the latest Spotify Beta are pitiful, yet make it obvious that there is massive promise here. We will see more opportunities for engagement with music, curators, and artists rather than passive catalog listening (although that’s great on Spotify because it will continue paying for years). 

    Beyond the obvious discovery apps (i.e. Pitchfork, Billboard) that have already been made, I imagine you’ll see artists and labels making their own apps powered by Spotify, which at minimum means never having to give free teaser songs away – instead you’ll get streaming royalties at least and amazing lead generation for merch and tickets. 

    It also gives labels another chance to develop and rediscover their audience. Artists and songwriters will be getting paid for remixes, mixtapes, playlists, etc. for ostensibly the first time. This increases the need for labels to be true partners, which from my (outsider) point of view seems like a nice fix for the long standing principle agent problems that the traditional industry seems to have.

    • http://wesleyverhoeve.com Wesley Verhoeve

      All the way on board with all of this Joe!

  • Kevin King

    Wesley – new blog post on this topic for you.

    http://www.kevin7211.com/post/15896234335/streaming-2012-and-beyond

  • Pingback: Help Your Customer (Or Fighting Them Means Losing Them)